Rights in Exile Newsletter – June 2019 Issue
Published: 5 Jun 2019
Issue 103, June 2019
ISSN 2049-2650
Editorial Team: Catherine Tyson, Nejla Sammakia, Kavita Kapur, Christian Jorgensen, Cristina de Nicolas, Nicolas Parent, Taylor Brooks, Olivia Bueno, Sirak Akalu Iyassu and Lucia Slot.
Chief Editor: Fiona McKinnon
Web links are in blue.
In this issue:
Articles
- Time to reimagine resettlement?
- Migration, asylum and border management: The new role of Frontex in the aftermath of the “refugee crisis”
- GCM Indicators — Objective 21: Cooperate in facilitating safe and dignified return and readmission, as well as sustainable reintegration
Detention and Deportation News
Statelessness
Short Pieces
- The Malaysian Government must uphold the customary international law of non-refoulement
- Ethiopia’s treatment of its own IDPs making crisis worse
- Former BIA Chairman Paul W. Schmidt excoriates IJs, BIA and CA11 panel in Salvadoran asylum case
- The obstacle to Rohingya return is clear: It’s still Myanmar
- Presidential memorandum furthers attack on asylum seekers in the US
- The deadly consequences of proposed Canadian asylum restrictions
- European Border and Coast Guard: Launch of first ever joint operation outside the EU
- 28 days: The impact of the ‘move on’ period for refugee mental health
- IDAHOT: UNHCR launching consultations on LGBTI refugees’ rights
Case Notes
- The Trump Administration plans to incarcerate some asylum seekers indefinitely
- CJEU on the effect of revocation or refusal to grant refugee status on grounds connected with the protection or security of the host member state
- US Court of Appeals allows Trump Administration to continue its policy of returning asylum seekers to Mexico
- Five new requests for preliminary rulings from the CJEU on Dublin III, family reunification, and return
- Judgment in Maltese case against Captain of MV Lifeline
- Judgment in Bulgaria on threat to national security of Syrian asylum applicant
- Case against Sweden on medical age assessment before Chancellor of Justice
- Two BIA decisions allow removal hearings to proceed in the US despite faulty notice to appear
Opinion/Editorial